Review of The Crucible (1996) by Yoli G — 24 May 2009
Arthur Miller's own adaptation to his 1950's dramatic play, which takes us back to the time of the Salem witch Trials of the late 17th Century. Although the book was only based on the the concept of the trials, most of the events in the plot are succinct and well-weaved fabrications on Miller's part.
This however does not remove the gist of the trial and why it is still a stalemate and bitter memory in American history. Most of the names of people in the film are of true people of the trials, nevertheless.
Daniel Day-Lewis is at the top of his game once more as John Proctor, a man with a rather modern take on life. Proctor is a historical figure as is his wife, Elizabeth (Joan Allen). Winona Ryder is also excellent as the rather demented girl who ironically shows more diabolical tendencies than any she has accused.
Here is where Miller uses artistic freedom to create an engaging plot. The recreation of the 17th century is superb from the village to the period dress/clothing. The parson's house looks exactly like the historical reality.
A gripping story sentimental to our modernist views; a well done film.
This review of The Crucible (1996) was written by Yoli G on 24 May 2009.
The Crucible has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
