Review of The Name of the Rose (1986) by Iris S — 27 May 2008
As a great fan of the book, I was determined to separate the film from it. And, when you do, the movie is actually very enjoyable.It's faithful to the novel, I'll add. But, ignoring that, it's a cold look at the neuroticism hidden under the surface of many - if not all - religions.
Though Connery is good, it is Slater who really breaks through in the movie, despite the odd pudding - bowl haircut. At seventeen or so, he managed to keep up with his much older co - stars superbly. No awards for the poor chap, though.
Overall, a great watch. The Da Vinci code for people who want to think.
This review of The Name of the Rose (1986) was written by Iris S on 27 May 2008.
The Name of the Rose has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
