Review of Lolita (1962) by Dietwald C — 15 Jan 2011

Easily one of the finest movies made in the 1960's. Stanley Kubrick directs a very interesting film, one that is different from his others. In that sense, there's a distinct intrigue that the movie has to offer.

For example, in the film's opening, the story just sort of jumps in, without any explanation. But as the film progresses, clues as to what may be going on are hinted, making it all the more fascinating to watch.

By the end I was sort of under-whelmed when I learned of the missing gaps-as how they were fairly simple compared to other Kubrick films. But looking at it all now it is on hell of a film, and will look better with every passing year, decade even.

The story is one I believe everyone can relate to in more ways then none, and the events that go one certainly have a payoff that wrap the film up on a good note. Kubrick's direction here is as always meticulous and ingeniously crafted, which makes other films pale in comparison that may deal with similar issues.

James Mason performs brilliantly and fits the roll of Humbert Humbert quite well. In addition to Sue Lyon who played the always rebellious Lolita, it was truly Peter Sellers who stole the show. He portrayed the jealous TV writer, Quitly, with much wealth and pizzazz, which ultimately makes Humbert jealous in the end(which is, the beginning?).

The film makes a full circle, and the epilogue is rather sad when you take into account all Humbert went through with Lolita, and all he did to keep them together(like he promised her). It certainly is a contemporary film, and should be studied and looked back upon.

Although we all know Kubrick couldn't stay away as he made "Eyes Wide Shut" 37 years later.