Review of The Name of the Rose (1986) by Byron B — 05 Mar 2013
Interesting concept. I recently finished reading Umberto Eco's novel. His books are quite intellectual, but I wonder why more haven't been adapted into movies. Freaky at times because Annaud chose character actors with such unique faces.
Because of the fairly standard length of this movie compared to the dense descriptions that make the novel a bit bulky, this adaptation leaves some character and plot details behind. As a librarian I appreciate the setting of this movie and the issues it presents regarding who controls knowledge and the value of all literature.
Some changes to the plot, like the Escher-esque stairs in the library, I don't think helped. Connery and Slater do their best to keep the mystery moving forward, despite a lot of theological inquisition that drags and distracts.
Connery's truly inquisitive detective-like monk is not given as much time to bring the tale out of its depressing medieval morass with witty jibes, puzzle solving, and his love of knowledge and laughter.
Ron Perlman gets to play one of his most odd and unique roles as Salvatore in this picture.
This review of The Name of the Rose (1986) was written by Byron B on 05 Mar 2013.
The Name of the Rose has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
