Review of Love's Labour's Lost (2000) by Thaïs J — 27 Dec 2010
Kenneth B: So, this time I want to make a Shakespeare film in the style of a Broadway musical. //.
Coke-fuelled-people-who-should-have-known-better: OMG, really? That sounds awesome. //.
KB: Yes, plus I want to set it pre-WW2, and have old-style newsreels. And stuff. You know. [Inhales deeply on Bob Marley-sized joint, wondering how far he can take this] Like that. //.
CFPWSHKB: Really? OMG, that sounds awesome. //.
KB: Yes yes. Dancing. There'll have to be a fool, too. Singing. No! Two fools. //.
CFPWSHKB: That sounds really awesome. OMG. //.
KB: And I insist on casting Alicia Silverstone in the lead role [sniggers - surely I've taken it too far now, he thinks]. Even though she's never done Shakespeare before. And can't act. And has a distracting weird mouth. //.
CFPWSHKB: OMG awesome. Really. That sounds... //.
KB: Yes, it does. And I'm going to make Richard Briers dance. Ha ha ha ha, that f$@&#er thinks he's so good!!!! //.
CFPWSHKB: OMG? Awesome? That sounds really...?
This review of Love's Labour's Lost (2000) was written by Thaïs J on 27 Dec 2010.
Love's Labour's Lost has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
