Review of Lord of the Flies (1963) by Tis D — 16 Nov 2007
From allmovie: Director Peter Brooks' depiction of William Golding's novel is appropriately dark and dreary; he is able to attain the perfect balance of innocence and hedonism needed to bring this adventure/morality tale to life.
The children are played primarily by non-actors, giving the film a much-needed natural feel. Some might view the lack of budget and amateurish acting as a flaw, but when compared to Harry Hook's more polished, higher-budgeted 1990 adaptation, it is clear Brooks' version is truer to the source material.
The images Brooks puts forth in his film are as shocking and startling as they were in the novel, in part due to the naivet�© of the actors. Piggy's Hugh Edwards physical appearance is just as Golding described him, as is Ralph James Aubry.
Creating an accurate film adaptation of a well received novel is no easy task, but Brooks has done a wonderful job of visualizing this classic novel.
This review of Lord of the Flies (1963) was written by Tis D on 16 Nov 2007.
Lord of the Flies has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
