Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 13 Jun 2026 at 10:30 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Kevin R — 06 Feb 2013

Share
Tweet

This is an undeniable classic especially considering Katherine Hepburn was practically born to play the role of Jo March. She is perfection in this film as are the ensemble cast for the most part. Douglass Montgomery threw me off guard as the lovable character Laurie. Having seen the 1994 remake before either of the older versions I had the Christian Bale Laurie firmly planted in my mind for this wonderful story. However after getting beyond this I came to thoroughly enjoy Montgomery's performance and in this case could see why Jo could not marry Laurie and why she ultimately fell in love with the Professor, in the 1994 remake this was harder to swallow.

The pace is remarkably slower here, people with short attention spans will not last the distance and those who think the 1994 film was a masterpiece will likewise not appreciate this gem of an interpretation of a most extraordinary story. Hepburn is the major reason for seeing this film, never have I seen such an actress made for such a character. The sets, score and the screenplay itself are wonderful and overall this is a beautiful film I find myself returning to many times. A perfect film for the lead up to Christmas. Definitely a classic.

This review of Little Women (1933) was written by on 06 Feb 2013.

Little Women has generally received positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Little Women

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS