Review of Husbands (1970) by Michael W — 22 Dec 2013
If you love the experimental work of John Cassavetes, you may really enjoy this film. However, you may not. His skill for creating an atmosphere of creativity and psychological exploration should never be denied.
And, his skill as a thoroughly unique voice in American Cinema should never be disputed. All of this does not mean he didn't sometimes make an off-step. HUSBANDS, is for me - an off-step. There are some magical moments -- particularly for Peter Falk, but those moments are separated by dated and rambling overtly quirky scenes that go no where of any real interest.
And, unlike most of his films this transgressive bender goes too far beyond the reach of reality. It seems excessive to spend over two hours with these three men just to drive home a point about the societal restraints that prevent male friends to actually grieve over the loss of one of their best friends and to mourn the passing of their youth.
The theme is over-worked and muddled by subplots of one bad marriage and a never fully explored sexual ambiguity of another. But, I'd much rather watch a Cassavetes off or miss-step than mediocre turns by other filmmakers.
This review of Husbands (1970) was written by Michael W on 22 Dec 2013.
Husbands has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
