Review of Blow-Up (1966) by Stefanie C — 03 Nov 2010
This is probably Antonioni's most popular film, but I don't find it nearly as stimulating as most of his earlier work, nor as beautiful to look at. I do like some things about it very much- particularly David Hemmings, an actor of extraordinary talent and one who was up to the challenge of the film's philosophical sting.
There is also a deliberation about the plotting, and while this isn't a new technique for the director its insertion into sixties pop culture makes for a unique feel and is probably responsible for the film's extensive art house play during that decade.
Where the film fails is when it gets too caught up in its own pretensions and takes itself oddly seriously. Thomas' discovery and self-discovery should be something that feels dangerous and exciting at the same time, but by the time those famous mimes practically conk him in the head with the idea we've long adjusted to it, and the revelation feels untimely.
This review of Blow-Up (1966) was written by Stefanie C on 03 Nov 2010.
Blow-Up has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
