Review of Two Brothers (2004) by No T — 31 Dec 2004
This movie dragged sometimes. But it was still a good movie.
I wondered whether I should have given it a 6 or a 7. A 6 for me still means good but I was wondering if I should had given it higher. In the end, it remained a 6.
It's a mixture of :fresh: s and :rotten:s, although there are more :fresh: s.
:up: Pros:
[list][*]The look and feel of the movie was great.l[*]Good acting.[*]The movie had a lot of heart.[*]Good plot.[*]The animals were obviously trained very well.. I am not sure whether there were special effects used in this movie.. if there was for the tigers, they were good special effects.[/list]:down: Cons:
[list][*]The movie dragged along a bit sometimes.[*]The beginning was a bit slow.[*]There was not a good balance of good and bad moments, for example, in Harry Potter movies, you'll get a dark moment and then a humourous scene. This movie had good moments and bad moments, but they were not balanced. In some movies this works but this is the type of movie which needs a balance.[/list]This wasn't a bad movie. Actually, it was rather a good movie. But it could have been a lot better.
3/5 - Pretty Good.
Oh.. and Happy New Year! :).
This review of Two Brothers (2004) was written by No T on 31 Dec 2004.
Two Brothers has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
