Review of To Return (1982) by Ch L — 18 Jan 2010
Good. Not bad. If you never see it though, it's not like you'll be worse off for it. So... not necessary. But aight. maybe this gets a 3.25??? I dunno.
For future reference though, if someone gets a best actor/actress nomination, that doesn't necessarily mean then film is amazing. That just means the performance was good. And there is more to movies than just performances, you know? I made that mistake in wanting to see this movie, and I made that mistake in wanting to see The Last King of Scotland as well. Neither one is a bad movie, no, but not the greatest either, you know? So... performances ain't everything a movie has to offer. y'dig?
This review of To Return (1982) was written by Ch L on 18 Jan 2010.
To Return has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
