Review of The Hunger Games (2012) by Redfordsto — 28 Mar 2012
The premise is excellent. An Orwellian future where children are offered to the state as entertainment. There was so much promise. Not having read the books, it's like being invited to a party but not knowing anyone.
There was very little character development. Further, the casting of Peta seemed poorly done. Lenny Kravitz does an excellent job in the background. The "Rue" racial thing, I don't get and can't imagine it makes a difference.
But my real question is, in a dystopian future, why are all the children so beautiful? Shouldn't there be some level of emaciation if the outer sectors struggle just to be fed? Despite these problems, the first half of the movie is well pace and knitted together.
Something happens in the first "combat" sequence. The combat fog falls and the pacing changes. The whole experience is uninspired. The action sequences themselves are far too close. Take your dramamine if you're in the theater and be prepare to have no idea what's happening.
The movie is interesting. But a good premise and interesting plot don't necessarily make a quality movie.
This review of The Hunger Games (2012) was written by Redfordsto on 28 Mar 2012.
The Hunger Games has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
