Review of The Hunger Games (2012) by Charlie T — 05 Apr 2014
The movie was okay. As usual the book was much better than the movie. It wasn't bad, but it's not a must see either. The story was acceptable, the graphics realistic, but the movie was two hours and 22 minutes and I felt every second of it.
It just felt empty, full of gaps.
This review of The Hunger Games (2012) was written by Charlie T on 05 Apr 2014.
The Hunger Games has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
