Review of The Hitman (1991) by Joe G — 03 Mar 2008
I was utterly shocked when I found out this was a 1991 movie. I expected it to be about ten years earlier at least. This movie had terrible acting, writing and virtually everything sucked. Only one thing saved this movie from being the worst ever.
.. Two Words: CHUCK NORRIS. His mullet is spectacular. The beard, Invincible. But besides the one positive aspect, there are tons of retarded things about this movie. On the front it says 'three and a half stars, Astonishing!' and on the back the first thing it says is "A four star action movie.
' This movie is so predictable, a handicapped newborn could have seen what is coming a mile away. But it added to the lame unintentional humor of this movie. Trust me, nothing really makes sense. All you will see is gangsters shooting gangsters then Chuck comes in and kills them all.
There is no real plot. Without Chuck, this movie would suck. And how did the kid survive being strapped to a chair and having a bomb set off right beside him??
This review of The Hitman (1991) was written by Joe G on 03 Mar 2008.
The Hitman has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
