Review of The Chronicles of Riddick (2004) by Andy S — 03 Nov 2010
WTF? This film had almost nothing to do with the first film, and it's thusly a bad sequel. As a standalone film, I'd give it a 50 rather than a 40, but it just makes almost no sense, is spoiled by bad acting (again), and considering the ludicrousness of the plot, takes itself far too seriously.
This review of The Chronicles of Riddick (2004) was written by Andy S on 03 Nov 2010.
The Chronicles of Riddick has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
