Review of Strangers on a Train (1951) by Sabrina I — 09 Oct 2010
Revisiting this film after a few years-I noticed some things that escaped me before. Although this film has always been one of my favorites, I had forgotten WHY. Now-it's quite clear. First off, Robert Walker is one of the most under-appreciated actors.
He's stunning in this film, his character of Bruno is one of the best villians I have ever seen and Walker makes him so compelling-you can't take your eyes off him. As if Walker had touched on his own dark side while acting out this character.
Farley Granger on the other hand, compared to Walker-he's just not as interesting to watch but to be fair-he wasn't bad either. If he was terrible, the film wouldn't have worked. Secondly, the camerawork is so effective in creating tension and suspense.
The film benefits so much from being shot in black and white. Thirdly, Hitchcock's genius shines in every scene-not a second is wasted. From the first meeting in the train to the end-each shot composition,each character movement has a purpose and adds layers to an already complex and tight thriller.
I loved the extended sequence at the carnival when Bruno is following Guy's wife-you know something bad is gonna happen, you just don't know WHEN. That's the exciting part. Also this is one of the few Hitchcock films where the ending wasn't disappointing for me, alot of times his endings were too abrupt-this one was satisfying enough.
Overall, RECOMMENDED - especially a SECOND viewing ;).
This review of Strangers on a Train (1951) was written by Sabrina I on 09 Oct 2010.
Strangers on a Train has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
