Review of Spider-Man 3 (2007) by Loletinalexis — 02 Jul 2019
Spider-Man 3 is, as everyone knows, the worst movie in the trilogy. However, it does not mean that it is bad. Moreover, it is acceptable if above all you are attentive to what does not fail, such as the action scenes or the performances of the actors (except the moments of "Emo Parker", which are to laugh at the ridiculous they are).
The main problem of this film is the number of enemies of Spider-Man, which can not develop properly, especially Venom, which is a total nonsense.
Then we have the plot of MJ, that all he does is to destroy the character of Kirsten Dunst, and that of Gwen Stacy, an absolute ****.
And then we have the stupid Bernard Houseman, which is directly why Harry Osborn's stupidities.
In short, Spider-Man 3 has good ideas, but the little freedom that Sony gave to Sam Raimi is noticeable, creating a film that had a lot of potential and that vanished.
**** you Sony.
This review of Spider-Man 3 (2007) was written by Loletinalexis on 02 Jul 2019.
Spider-Man 3 has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
