Review of Spider-Man (1977) by Eber N — 18 Jul 2016
Absurd, bland, hollow, pathetic, ridiculous, misleading, unnecessary and hasty reinvention of the franchise Spider-Man, no resemblance at all to the original material that we are used to reading comics and / or watch the animated series, where is the famous phrase of uncle Ben's, "with great power comes great responsibility" ?, where is the first fight of Spider-Man, in a wrestling match Peter Parker ?, because life is not won in the Daily Bugle ?, all this is nothing but a farce assembly to extort money from people, I will still like more the first two of Sam Raimi, better not have much to do with the comics and put his point view of the character, but at least the origin of Peter Parker was respected: when piqued radioactive spider, when he fought in a ring to make pasta, when after the death of his uncle accepted responsibilities, while working as a photographer to pay for their studies and / or when he decided to stop being righteous and threw away his disguise to take her own life.
Sony Pictures had to have waited ten or twenty years to restart the series, make a very correct and dignified movie a myth of comics as trepamuros deserved, not get her so suddenly without that was a pure and simple stupidity, maybe like the little ones playing with dolls or video games character and that when they grow perhaps realize that this film is grim, in my opinion Spider-Man 2 Raimi is much better, for its good emotional story, mature , deep and fun, its amazing action sequences, amazing visual effects and an amazing villain, Dr. Octopus masterfully played by Alfred Molina, that if it is to make a good film lanzatelarañas as it should and is not tomfoolery.
This review of Spider-Man (1977) was written by Eber N on 18 Jul 2016.
Spider-Man has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
