Silent Hill is incoherent and lacks suspense in an atmospheric 1st h alf, but it gets better in the second half of the film as we receive closure. Yes, this flick is over 2 hours long, but it manages to become exciting after a really bad and unexciting first half.
This review of Silent Hill (2006) was written by Oliver S on 21 Aug 2011.
Silent Hill has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 20 Oct 2016
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
By Dragonfly44 (103) on 25 Oct 2020
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
Review of Silent Hill (2006)
By Jenn M (533) on 31 Jan 2017
Review of Witness for the Prosecution (1957)
By Michael R (2,154) on 05 May 2010
Review of Impulse (1974)
Review of Creature of Darkness (2009)
Review of The Human Centipede (First Sequence) (2009)
By Frank Scheck (1,741) for The Hollywood Reporter (7,050) on 28 Oct 2011
Review of True Crime (1995)
By Michael Dequina (1,684) for TheMovieReport.com (1,582) on 28 Dec 2004
Popular Movies Right Now
