Review of Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011) by Guardian210 — 24 Jun 2011
Congratulations Disney you officially ruined a perfectly good trilogy of movies. I'm glad the drive-in that I saw this movie at had this as a double feature with Cars 2, because if it hadn't and only showed this piece of **** I would have demanded my money back.
The only real reason why Penelope Cruz was in the movie, was for her good looks, which is a waste of a great talent. If you're a director that plans to put add a female character for the sole purpose of looking good, put a good looking actress with no talent in there.
You'd save yourself a lot of money. I want to know what on gods green earth the director was smoking when he thought it would be a brilliant idea to, not only have Captain Barbossa Captain a Royal Navy Ship, but emblazon the British flag in the background behind him.
I mean really, did the flag HAVE to be that big. Captain Sparrow, who I agree is the flagship of the trilogy, and without him all four movies are pointless, not to say this one is just because he's in it, because it's the most pointless of all the movies, I commend Jack for being the captain that goes down with his ship (the trilogy).
The movie is missing two keys that would have made it a better sight to see. Quite frankly the trilogy would be better off if this movie had never been made in the first place. To put it even simpler, if I was given the option of watching this movie again or watching my **** go down the toilet, the choice would be easy.
.. watch my **** go down the toilet, the horror ends quickly and dosen't drag on for two and a quarter hours.
This review of Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (2011) was written by Guardian210 on 24 Jun 2011.
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
