Review of Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press (2017) by Terranguy93 — 23 Jun 2017
The documentary is painfully biased, making very few attempts at finding any kind of dissenting opinion and instead focused on journalists celebrating other journalists more like members of a cult than anything.
It breaks down into 3 main parts. The first is a discussion of the Gawker/Hulk Hogan lawsuit from the perspective of Gawker and various journalists defending them with only a short section from the opposing attorney.
It transitions into a second act focused on making Peter Thiel into the boogeyman before its third act about rich people buying media and how bad it is. By the end, it devolves into essentially a bunch of journalists circle jerking about how heroic and wonderful they are.
It is borderline propaganda that refuses to look at itself critically and the journalists seem more like cult members than anything else.
This review of Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press (2017) was written by Terranguy93 on 23 Jun 2017.
Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
