Review of Lovelace (2013) by Mike P — 30 Oct 2013

It's hard to believe that real Lovelace was so stupid to be like that, I already heard that she did sex with a dog before her career in pornography! The movie ,which tries a lot to make her like a victim, is in real need to explain a lot of hidden things about that controversial life of Linda, then who says that (Deep Throat) is her first and last movie? Is it really logic to be a porn star in just one movie? and who says that she had just one book?

I expected more reality of that movie, I cannot say that I'm disappointed but it needs more credibility.I don't like that way of flashback, it was not necessary as the end will be like that with a jump for 6 years, that broke the editing. I was afraid that the movie will be explicit porn kind of, I was afraid of Amanda Seyfried herself in such a role, but absolutely I was wrong, the movie is not that sexual in telling the life of a pornstar, and Seyfried is shining and making it emotional one maybe more that it needs. I am totally charmed by Sharon Stone in her role here, she was great, and you cannot talk about good performances without speaking about Peter Sarsgaard who was good but not enough convincing for me. Something good must be noticed, is the.

Costumes so is the depiction too.

Though the script is deficient in details and the strange way of telling the story, with all these good.

Performances you cannot say that is bad, but I think it could have been better.