Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 21 Jun 2026 at 12:34 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Hadzhipetkova — 04 Apr 2021

Share
Tweet

So much worse than the 1996 version!

The cast looks nothing like the description in the book.

Jo does not act boyish enough as she is supposed to, and she does not look boyish either. Amy, who is the youngest sister, looks older than everyoneSo much worse than the 1996 version!

The cast looks nothing like the description in the book.

Jo does not act boyish enough as she is supposed to, and she does not look boyish either.

Amy, who is the youngest sister, looks older than everyone else, including Teddy. They have 24-years-old access playing 12-year-old kid! Her voice is deeper than her oldest sister Meg.

Teddy is supposed to be Joe’s age, but he looks like teenager when already married.

The only person who looks and acts appropriate for their role is probably Beth.

The storyline is a complete mess, keeps jumping back and forward between the first and second part of the book, and thus makes everything very confusing even for someone who was read the book, especially because the characters do not age, apparently, or change in any way.

There are a lot of made up moments and dialogues throughout the movie, that do not appear in the book.

The whole first part of the book - the actual ‘Little women’ part it’s rushed through, and most of the important dialogues are cut off.

This review of Little Women (2019) was written by on 04 Apr 2021.

Little Women has generally received very positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Little Women

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS