Review of King Kong (1976) by Stevep. — 17 Dec 2005
Some people say Kong is a flawless masterpiece. Some say it is a boring, grueling crapfest. The truth: Neither; Kong falls somewhere in between. The CGI is nothing to complain about, because it's some of the best ever used.
My main beef with the movie is that most of it plays out like a videogame. Naomi Watts swings back and forth and nearly gets eaten. Big bugs make the audience scream out, "Eww!!!" I would equate King Kong with one of those 3D movies at Disney World.
Then the very next moment it is playing sad music and you are staring at the soulful eyes of a dying Kong. Also, I agree. 3 Hours is too long of a movie. I don't blame Jackson, because trying to entertain someone for 3 hours is an ambitious task.
Bottome Line: Some of it is a marvel to look at, and some is really cool, but I never have much fun with Jackson's movies.
This review of King Kong (1976) was written by Stevep. on 17 Dec 2005.
King Kong has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
