"King Kong" is scary at parts (especially if you're a kid), and fun to watch. The effects were great for the time, and it's an easy way to spend 90 minutes. Not as good as the 2005 film, but I imagine it's a lot better than the 1976 film (which I haven't seen yet).
This review of King Kong (1933) was written by Noah Abraham G on 11 Nov 2012.
King Kong has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of King Kong (1933)
Review of King Kong (1933)
By Alex K (2,253) on 13 Oct 2017
Review of King Kong (1933)
Review of King Kong (1933)
Review of King Kong (1933)
Review of King Kong (1933)
Review of Jaws: The Revenge (1987)
By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 01 Jan 2000
Review of The Flintstones (1994)
By Jonathan Rosenbaum (1,657) for Chicago Reader (7,190) on 27 Jul 2015
Review of Supergator (2007)
Review of Madagascar (2005)
Review of Charlie's Angels (2000)
Review of Dinocroc (2004)
Review of Splash (1984)
By Adam W (1,422) on 13 Jan 2013
Popular Movies Right Now
