Review of Ironclad (2011) by Apemonkey666 — 31 Mar 2013
A Siege in the dark ages was probably very much like it was in this film: much waiting, starving, boredom interspersed with moments of extreme bloody violence. For the 25m$ budget they got a decent cast and nice landscapes but you can tell that there weren't many extras to save on crowd duplication VFX shots and also to save on costumes.
This causes the film to miss the epic scale that siege battles need. Maybe I'm a bit harsch for this film, it's good fun, but they should have made it a bit shorter (about 15 mins) to keep the pace flowing.
This review of Ironclad (2011) was written by Apemonkey666 on 31 Mar 2013.
Ironclad has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
