Review of Into the Woods (2014) by Daschnake — 26 Dec 2014

As a preface to my analysis I would like to say: if you are a parent looking for a good family film that you'll all enjoy, take caution before going to see "Into the Woods." It's not that there's anything particularly inappropriate, but rather that "Woods" is a complex musical for adults. This is why the "Junior" version of the stage musical (intended for younger audiences) ends after the first act. I believe it is pretty deceptive how they've marketed this film. Unless you have some pretty smart kids, do them a favor and save it for them for when they're older.

The film version of this staple of American theatre is a bit of a mixed bag. The first "act" of the movie is handled with pretty seamless precision (the only exception being my personal distaste for the direction they take the Wolf in). The performers are outstanding (Emily Blunt and James Corden are really special as the Baker and his Wife), the cinematography is beautiful, and the vocals are palpable.

Unfortunately, the second half manages to be unsatisfactory for most, for completely different reasons. Those seeking a light, easily digestible fairy tale will feel put off by the dark turn the second half takes. On the flip side, purists of the musical will be frustrated by some pretty glaring omissions (notably "No More" and the extreme truncation of the first reprise of "Children will Listen") that water down the dramatic impact of the movie.

If you're interested in being intellectually challenged and you aren't a fan of the stage musical, "Into the Woods" is certainly worth watching. If you aren't, this probably isn't a movie for you. If you're a fan of the musical, prepare for some frustrating changes. However, it's still worth watching, if for no other reason than seeing Chris Pine and Billy Magnussen do "Agony." Seriously. It's that good.