Review of Escape from L.A. (1996) by Stefan G — 31 Jul 2012

Touted as a sequel to the 1981 cult film, âEscape From New York,â? âEscape From L.A.â? is more accurately a remake of the original. Obviously, co-writer and Director John Carpenter had more important things on his mind (like balancing his checkbook) than actually devising an original story. The result is about as enjoyable as cold leftovers. Those unfamiliar with the plot of the original may find some brief amusement in the premise of Los Angeles (now an island) serving as a wasteland for deported criminals, misfits and outcasts.

Kurt Russell (looking amazingly good considering the twenty-five year interval) reprises his role as "Snake" Plissken, an ex-commando turned outlaw who is recruited against his will to carry out a suicide mission within the boundaries of the gang-controlled colony. Along the way, he runs into various colorful characters (mostly played by well-known actors looking for a cameo), has a few skirmishes and suffers a few setbacks before pulling off the impossible.

There is some minor enjoyment in the allegorical reference to L.A./Hollywood as a modern Sodom and Gomorrah; with the visual effects department having a field day with the recurring images of destroyed Southern California landmarks and multiple allusions to the attendant free-wheeling lifestyle.

The rise of technology affords âEscape From L.A.â? cleaner graphics and jazzier special effects than were accomplished in the low-budget original- a minimal bonus. Beyond that, there is nothing improved with this version over the original. The premise seems much less compelling than it did a quarter century ago- too many apocalyptic films having come and gone in-between.

Additionally, Carpenter loses what little sense of humanity the original contained. In this version, there is nobody that we are allowed to care for or take an interest in. Indeed, with the exception of Plissken and his adversaries, there isn't a sympathetic character with more than fifteen minutes of screen time in the whole film.

Despite the deliberate efforts of Carpenter, Russell and Debra Hill (they share the writing credits), the film fails to measure up on any level. That they intentionally duplicated the original is apparent through the structure, content and dialogue of the story. Every element of the original has a counterpart in this version, right down to the opening and closing lines which are lifted verbatim from the first film. Why they chose to approach the film in this fashion is not nearly as obvious. Whether its a homage, a failed spoof on itself, or just a case of laziness- it's hard to say. What is easy to ascertain is that the film will be a disappointment to all but the most forgiving fans.

Rated R for some vulgar language, abundant violence and rampant over-acting, âEscape From L.A.â? is going to have a tough time finding sanctuary in any of the theaters I frequent.