Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 22 Jun 2026 at 00:46 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Russ B — 10 Feb 2016

Share
Tweet

Though not the best of the early Bonds, Dr. No, the franchise's maiden voyage, still feels the most fresh. Connery is male virility personified. His charisma is so unmistakable that, more than 50 years of social progress later, we somehow forgive his brutish misogyny.

It's all terrible of course, but you can't say man doesn't make it look good. Though something of a ground zero for action movies as we know them, Dr. No's pacing may not translate too well for today's viewers.

There is definitely an adjustment for historical period, and in more ways than one. Besides the sexism, we have the superstitious quasi-subjects of Britain's diminished imperialism, and the idea that casting a white Jewish guy as an Asian villain makes sense.

Through all that, Dr. No still stands as sleek, brutal entertainment. Joseph Wiseman is ice cold pleasure as the prototypical Bond super villain. Ursula Andress's Honey Ryder does a better job at showing the dangerous self-sufficiency behind her character's beach bimbo exterior than she is normally given credit for.

And Jack Lord, weird sunglasses and all, is the series's best Felix. There were better-paced, more exciting Bond movies to come, but Dr. No still holds up the mango tree.

This review of Dr. No (1962) was written by on 10 Feb 2016.

Dr. No has generally received very positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of Dr. No

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

More Reviews

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS