Review of Body Double (1984) by Pauline Kael for The New Yorker — 19 Nov 1984
Contrived, shallow, distasteful, and ultimately pointless, BODY DOUBLE is more an exercise in empty cinematic style than an engrossing thriller. Although cinematographer Burum executes some absolutely breathtaking camera moves, his effort goes for naught when pitted against director De Palma and cowriter Avrech's insipid narrative.
What De Palma has done here is simply take elements from two superb Alfred Hitchcock films, REAR WINDOW and VERTIGO, and combine them into one insipid film. While Griffith is sexy and appealing in her role, Wasson's character is so bland that he generates little interest.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Body Double (1984) was written by Pauline Kael and published by The New Yorker on 19 Nov 1984.
Body Double has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
