Review of Blow-Up (1966) by Chris K — 18 Apr 2009
Not very impressive and I think an actual great filmmaker named Ingmar Bergman would agree. Most people are aware that Bergman thought Antonioni was not impressive, he did however call this film a masterpiece, which I think he was just bieng generous.
I don't even know what this film was about, it has nothing it is empty and almost pointless. However, some of the scenes were very visually impressive like the one at the end and I liked some of the acting.
I am sure there is something there but isnt there always in a film? And like Bergman I am bieng generous. I did not find this film boring, it was actually quite involving and interesting but when it was over I did not feel like anything happenend that changed the character.
All I got was a feeling that I should feel that he was isolated.
This review of Blow-Up (1966) was written by Chris K on 18 Apr 2009.
Blow-Up has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
