Review of Bicentennial Man (1999) by Filipeneto — 02 Mar 2020

It could be more provocative but it prefers an equally pleasant sentimental approach.

This film takes place in the year 2067, at a time when cars are already flying and domestic robots are already a relatively accessible reality for consumers. Richard Martin and his family decide to buy one, to help with the most boring chores around the house, but his new robot, Andrew, quickly begins to show signs of an unusual humanity in a machine, but much appreciated by its new owner: he is creative, he begins to feel emotions and to cultivate, with the support of his owner, his newfound humanity.

Based on a book by Isaac Asimov, this film is a familiar, intimate and emotional comedy about a machine that wants to be human. The plot is quite obvious but it didn't seem like a problem to me. Designed to speak to our sentimental side, the film, directed by Chris Columbus, tells a story in a smooth and flat way, without complicated issues connected to Andrew's desire to be human. Columbus, by the way, is not a skilled director for these kinds of things, preferring to escape as much as he can from raising these issues and presenting us with smooth, light and quite direct films, with humorous touches. For example, the film never talks about the existence of documentation in Andrew's name (birth certificate, identity card, driving license, social security, etc.). Being a robot, he has no reason to have documents, but if he wants to be a human and be part of society, he must have them and society may not be able or open to integrate him in this way. The film even mentions his bank account, which indicates that he would necessarily have to have some kind of documents, but the film never speaks of this paradox.

Despite not enjoying the story well and never trying to be more provocative, the film is pleasant and appeals to our feelings. Robbin Williams is a good actor and does his job very well here, again showing his versatility for more dramatic and sentimental roles to everyone who thinks he was just a comedic actor. Sam Neill is just as good, Embeth Davidtz was satisfying but not so convincing, Kiersten Warren is just plain stupid and only improves on the final appearance (I really would also hit her on the head like Andrew did).

Good scenarios, good production values, a good soundtrack by James Horner, a good cast working very well but, above all, a pleasant and emotional story are good reasons to see this film. It is not a perfect film, it is not one of the best of any involved, but it is still worth it.