Review of At Close Range (1986) by Vincent Canby for The New York Times — 23 Apr 2004
At Close Range is never boring. There's something bold about the film's wealth of imagery, but it also so overstates the material of the screenplay that it eventually annihilates both it and the story, which might possibly have been moving and terrifying.
This just looks like fancy movie making.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of At Close Range (1986) was written by Vincent Canby and published by The New York Times on 23 Apr 2004.
At Close Range has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
