Review of Annapolis (2006) by Arthur Salm for San Diego Union-Tribune — 27 Jan 2006
Bulling ahead through hackneyed scene after hackneyed scene, it grinds out an hour and 48 minutes of nonstop cliche, never offering so much as a marginally clever line, never succumbing to an original thought, never veering from the rutted path.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of Annapolis (2006) was written by Arthur Salm and published by San Diego Union-Tribune on 27 Jan 2006.
Annapolis has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
