Review of Alexander (2004) by Kamgeforce — 14 Apr 2019

The most underrated movie I know... Val Kilmer´s performance nominated for Razzie **** as worst supporting actor? Are you **** kidding me? His talks with young Alexander, especially in the cave were some of the best father talks of heritage and legacy in cinema.

The movie is for the most part historically accurate, the battles are epic, the visuals are great, Vangelis soundtrack is transcendental work of art... Boohoo Farrel had an accent, who gives a **** If you call his performance "bad acting", you are delusional.

He got the essence and legend of Alexander right. Alexander was more than a man, his ambition made him distant a alone, even among his men and Farrel captured that beautifully. His speech to his men to march to India, pleading for one more month, seeing the difference of mindsets between mortals and a man with endless ambition.

.. Anthony Hopkins as old Ptolemy, Christopher Plummer as Aristotle giving lecture to young Alexander and his future generals and friends who would change the course of the world forever... This movie has some of the most epic and impactful scenes in cinematography.

.. Honestly all I can say is **** the critics and **** the sheep that cant think for themselves, I don´t believe a man with three digit iq and healthy levels of testosterone can watch this masterpiece and not be left with awe and respect for both the man Alexander was and the movie that portrayed his story so beautifully.