Review of 28 Weeks Later (2007) by Conorb. — 30 Oct 2007
How misleading critics can be. Washington Post: 100, The New York Times: 90, Chicago Tribune: 88. You've got to be joking. You'd swear this movie was up there with the God Father. Yes it is somewhat entertaining, yes there is some good camera angles etc.
, but the bottom line is that once again this is a sequel that is just cashing in on it's predecessor. "Imaginative" ? I don't think so. How about: predictable, implausible in parts (didn't think "zombies" can teleport) and unimaginative.
The ending also is somewhat weak. The acting is good, the action, make-up etc. good but that doesn't make a great movie. If it comes out on TV check it out but don't bother otherwise.
This review of 28 Weeks Later (2007) was written by Conorb. on 30 Oct 2007.
28 Weeks Later has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
