...it's laughably bad, which means that if you can approach it as a really stupid film you just might find yourself enjoying it.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of 10,000 BC (2008) was written by Daniel M. Kimmel and published by Worcester Telegram & Gazette on 07 Mar 2008.
10,000 BC has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
More reviews of this movie:
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
By Ilja S (505) on 08 Sep 2015
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
By Joe Neumaier (1,294) for New York Daily News (5,623) on 14 Nov 2015
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
Review of 10,000 BC (2008)
By Tom B (1,265) on 06 Feb 2016
Review of The Flintstones (1994)
By Jonathan Rosenbaum (1,657) for Chicago Reader (7,190) on 27 Jul 2015
Review of Stargate (1994)
Review of Apocalypto (2006)
Review of An American Werewolf in London (1981)
Review of Sherlock Jr. (1924)
By Alex K (2,253) on 04 Oct 2017
Review of Nobody Knows (2004)
Review of Rocky III (1982)
By Steven1981 (209) on 21 Mar 2020
Popular Movies Right Now
![[REC]² (2009)](https://cdn2.cinafilm.com/static/img/movie/aa4ee673/200/1-rec-2-2009.jpg)
