Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) by Ryan H — 24 Oct 2007

There's nothing really wrong with this movie, it's just not a very funny premise. It's acted fine, but very few jokes sink this ship pretty quickly.

This review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) was written by Ryan H on 24 Oct 2007.

Welcome to Mooseport has generally received negative reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes

More reviews of this movie:

More Reviews of Welcome to Mooseport

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Don S (1,504) on 10 Jul 2011

Gene Hackman is one of my favorite actors. He is incredibly versatile. Maura Tierney is someone I'll go out of my way to watch…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Frances H (1,591) on 27 Oct 2014

Not that bad, wachable. Silly but watchable. Easily the best made for TBS movie ever made…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Allan C (2,173) on 08 Dec 2012

Endearing enough of time-waster comedy about local boy Romano running for mayor against Mooseport's newest resident, former president Hackman…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Dawdlingpoet (1,123) on 28 Nov 2021

This is a pretty corny and sentimental movie but it is also mildly amusing…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Johnny T (1,375) on 23 Mar 2011

Gene Hackman, bristling with wit and energy, is at his amusing best in the robust comedy…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Chris B (2,902) on 09 Feb 2012

Much much better than I expected it to be, although dont expect a classic here. this is a very good under-rated film, check it out…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Keldon M (45) on 10 Mar 2012

I liked this movie, it's no Godfather sure, but it's still better than a 14%…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Ann Hornaday (1,919) for Washington Post (9,851) on 23 Dec 2013

A movie marred by a flaccid script, listless pacing, a plethora of cutesy-poo gags and Ray Romano…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Mike Clark (1,024) for USA Today (4,117) on 14 Oct 2014

David Mamet handled such small-town whimsy better in 2000's State and Main. Hackman could play his role in his sleep, but Romano IS asleep…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Anya S (261) on 15 May 2011

I hoped this one would be better. I found it to be quite boring, uninteresting, and uncaptivating. And an hour and 50 minutes was obscene…

Read Review

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

Review of The Lost Boys (1987)

By Deadanothink (7) on 24 Jul 2014

OH C'MON SERIOUSLY? This movie is an I WANT AND I CAN'T. The worst vampire movie ever…

Read Review

Review of Charlotte's Web (2006)

By Adaml. (30) on 27 Jan 2007

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. I wasted 5 bucks on this movie. the acting was terrible. This is a disgrace to E.B…

Read Review

Review of My Cousin Vinny (1992)

By Kevin R (2,184) on 02 Apr 2017

I don't understand what people see in this movie, sure it's semi interesting on the first watch, but after you realize the 2 hour runtime comes…

Read Review

Review of Gremlins (1984)

By Alysha V (14) on 05 Jul 2012

Not funny or scary, with a bland storyline and boring characters…

Read Review

Review of American Ultra (2015)

By Lightfantastic (1) on 03 Oct 2015

A poorly written film, poorly cast and suffered from too much hype…

Read Review

Review of Chicken Little (2005)

By Allisonr. (3) on 06 Nov 2005

What happened to classic disney? I'm pretty disgusted with this film…

Read Review

Review of Lolita (1962)

By Manohla Dargis (1,909) for L.A. Weekly (3,142) on 25 May 2012

Irons' doleful lassitude sucks the energy right out of the story and makes this listlessly directed adaptation droop all the more…

Read Review

Review of Amarcord (1973)

By Jim H (1,089) on 11 Jan 2011

Dear Federico Fellini: I just watched Amarcord, and I'm left wondering: if this was what your youth was like, why am I not more famous…

Read Review

Review of Critters 2 (1988)

By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 02 Jul 2009

It lacks all of the style and sense of fun of the original Critters (1986) and has no reason for existence - aside, of course, from the fact…

Read Review

Review of Critters (1986)

By Imthenoob (1,101) on 18 Apr 2019

The movie is only an hour and a half and yet it takes more than 30 minutes for the Critters to actually appear…

Read Review

More Reviews

Popular Movies Right Now

Gone Girl

2014

81%1,229 Reviews

Deadpool 2

2018

76%1,635 Reviews

Godzilla vs. Kong

2021

66%184 Reviews

Blade Runner 2049

2017

80%2,332 Reviews

Mad Max: Fury Road

2015

83%1,378 Reviews

No Hard Feelings

2023

65%90 Reviews

The Equalizer

2014

69%994 Reviews

Avengers: Endgame

2019

86%432 Reviews

The Batman

2022

75%430 Reviews

The Platform

2019

70%94 Reviews