Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) by Auds T — 18 Jun 2006

It's called Mooseport for goodness' sake. It's not the best movie, but it made me laugh a few times.

This review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) was written by Auds T on 18 Jun 2006.

Welcome to Mooseport has generally received negative reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes

More reviews of this movie:

More Reviews of Welcome to Mooseport

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Kartik K (25) on 27 Jun 2017

So sad that the great Gene Hackman's final film was this disgrace…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Jonathan Rosenbaum (1,657) for Chicago Reader (7,190) on 07 Feb 2017

Tierney and Hackman contribute most to keeping this life-size and funny…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Hillary D (258) on 08 Jun 2012

Nice movie even tho there were stereotypical parts…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By David Edelstein (2,124) for Slate (2,081) on 21 Dec 2015

I'm not sure if the movie's lack of momentum is the fault of the director, the screenwriter, or the star, Romano…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Jared M (634) on 11 Jul 2012

Just a childish, boring film that would make most politicians vomit and leave the room…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Todd Mccarthy (1,810) for Variety (12,700) on 28 May 2017

Lacks the antic energy and inspired imagination that might have put this over as a sharp-witted community comedy in the Preston Sturges vein…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Mike Clark (1,024) for USA Today (4,117) on 14 Oct 2014

David Mamet handled such small-town whimsy better in 2000's State and Main. Hackman could play his role in his sleep, but Romano IS asleep…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Grami Tami N (106) on 14 Sep 2012

Love Christine Baransky... Even though her part was small, she was hysterical…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Brian H (1,202) on 07 Aug 2012

A mildly amusing, but bland and forgettable comedy…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Johnny T (1,375) on 23 Mar 2011

Gene Hackman, bristling with wit and energy, is at his amusing best in the robust comedy…

Read Review

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

Review of The Lost Boys (1987)

By Deadanothink (7) on 24 Jul 2014

OH C'MON SERIOUSLY? This movie is an I WANT AND I CAN'T. The worst vampire movie ever…

Read Review

Review of Charlotte's Web (2006)

By Adaml. (30) on 27 Jan 2007

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. I wasted 5 bucks on this movie. the acting was terrible. This is a disgrace to E.B…

Read Review

Review of My Cousin Vinny (1992)

By Kevin R (2,184) on 02 Apr 2017

I don't understand what people see in this movie, sure it's semi interesting on the first watch, but after you realize the 2 hour runtime comes…

Read Review

Review of Lake Placid (1999)

By Steve Newton (322) for Georgia Straight (1,078) on 02 Feb 2014

It stinks so bad that Buntzen Lake, where this bogus effort was partly filmed, probably still reeks…

Read Review

Review of Gremlins (1984)

By Alysha V (14) on 05 Jul 2012

Not funny or scary, with a bland storyline and boring characters…

Read Review

Review of American Ultra (2015)

By Lightfantastic (1) on 03 Oct 2015

A poorly written film, poorly cast and suffered from too much hype…

Read Review

Review of Lolita (1962)

By Manohla Dargis (1,909) for L.A. Weekly (3,142) on 25 May 2012

Irons' doleful lassitude sucks the energy right out of the story and makes this listlessly directed adaptation droop all the more…

Read Review

Review of Monster Trucks (2016)

By Nick Dent (153) for Daily Telegraph (Australia) (376) on 26 Jan 2017

The spectacle of a loveable leviathan pounding down the motorway inside a rust bucket -- the ultimate hybrid vehicle -- is one of the silliest…

Read Review

Review of Critters 2 (1988)

By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 02 Jul 2009

It lacks all of the style and sense of fun of the original Critters (1986) and has no reason for existence - aside, of course, from the fact…

Read Review

Review of Critters (1986)

By Imthenoob (1,101) on 18 Apr 2019

The movie is only an hour and a half and yet it takes more than 30 minutes for the Critters to actually appear…

Read Review

More Reviews

Popular Movies Right Now

Everything Everywhere All at Once

2022

78%291 Reviews

Split

2017

71%1,218 Reviews

Hereditary

2018

72%1,650 Reviews

The Voyeurs

2021

58%19 Reviews

Blade Runner 2049

2017

80%2,332 Reviews

The Platform

2019

70%94 Reviews

Interstellar

2014

83%1,261 Reviews

Talk to Me

2023

74%83 Reviews

Fifty Shades of Grey

2015

43%1,173 Reviews

Three Thousand Years of Longing

2022

65%84 Reviews

Movies You Viewed Recently

Welcome to Mooseport

2004

38%251 Reviews

Misha and the Wolves

2021

65%13 Reviews

Twilight

1994

60%766 Reviews

Island in the Sky

1938

64%25 Reviews

Bride of Frankenstein

1935

82%641 Reviews

Nautanki Saala!

2013

46%16 Reviews

Days of Wine and Roses

1963

78%133 Reviews

Ain't Them Bodies Saints

2013

65%293 Reviews

Scary Movie 5

2013

32%632 Reviews

Adaptation.

2002

79%737 Reviews