Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) by Peter Sobczynski for Critic Doctor — 19 Feb 2004

'Welcome to Mooseport' comes off as nothing more than an extended TV episode with some Very Special Guest Stars...

You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.

This review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004) was written by Peter Sobczynski and published by Critic Doctor on 19 Feb 2004.

Welcome to Mooseport has generally received negative reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes

More reviews of this movie:

More Reviews of Welcome to Mooseport

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Josh R (768) on 17 Nov 2011

Its a lot better then people think it is, you suck people. ray and gene come on losers…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Marjorie Baumgarten (1,950) for Austin Chronicle (7,653) on 11 Apr 2012

As is, Welcome to Mooseport is clunkily earthbound as its characters and the situations plod forward while never getting anywhere…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Mike Clark (1,024) for USA Today (4,117) on 14 Oct 2014

David Mamet handled such small-town whimsy better in 2000's State and Main. Hackman could play his role in his sleep, but Romano IS asleep…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Keenan S (659) on 20 Jul 2015

This movie drove Hackman into retirement…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Greg C (624) on 30 Dec 2011

I was surprised at how much I liked this film. I appreciate the fact Gene Hackman can play comedy as well as dramatic roles…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By William H (687) on 18 Mar 2011

This movie is proof that not everyone loves raymond…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Jonathan Rosenbaum (1,657) for Chicago Reader (7,190) on 07 Feb 2017

Tierney and Hackman contribute most to keeping this life-size and funny…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Thequietgamer (1,082) on 20 May 2013

A painfully unfunny movie. I was honestly just sitting there bored throughout the entire movie…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Grami Tami N (106) on 14 Sep 2012

Love Christine Baransky... Even though her part was small, she was hysterical…

Read Review

Review of Welcome to Mooseport (2004)

By Dawdlingpoet (1,123) on 28 Nov 2021

This is a pretty corny and sentimental movie but it is also mildly amusing…

Read Review

More reviews of this movie

Reviews of Similar Movies

Review of Charlotte's Web (2006)

By Adaml. (30) on 27 Jan 2007

This movie is one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. I wasted 5 bucks on this movie. the acting was terrible. This is a disgrace to E.B…

Read Review

Review of My Cousin Vinny (1992)

By Kevin R (2,184) on 02 Apr 2017

I don't understand what people see in this movie, sure it's semi interesting on the first watch, but after you realize the 2 hour runtime comes…

Read Review

Review of Lake Placid (1999)

By Steve Newton (322) for Georgia Straight (1,078) on 02 Feb 2014

It stinks so bad that Buntzen Lake, where this bogus effort was partly filmed, probably still reeks…

Read Review

Review of Gremlins (1984)

By Alysha V (14) on 05 Jul 2012

Not funny or scary, with a bland storyline and boring characters…

Read Review

Review of American Ultra (2015)

By Lightfantastic (1) on 03 Oct 2015

A poorly written film, poorly cast and suffered from too much hype…

Read Review

Review of Chicken Little (2005)

By Allisonr. (3) on 06 Nov 2005

What happened to classic disney? I'm pretty disgusted with this film…

Read Review

Review of Lolita (1962)

By Manohla Dargis (1,909) for L.A. Weekly (3,142) on 25 May 2012

Irons' doleful lassitude sucks the energy right out of the story and makes this listlessly directed adaptation droop all the more…

Read Review

Review of Amarcord (1973)

By Jim H (1,089) on 11 Jan 2011

Dear Federico Fellini: I just watched Amarcord, and I'm left wondering: if this was what your youth was like, why am I not more famous…

Read Review

Review of Critters 2 (1988)

By Roger Ebert (5,190) for Chicago Sun-Times (7,580) on 02 Jul 2009

It lacks all of the style and sense of fun of the original Critters (1986) and has no reason for existence - aside, of course, from the fact…

Read Review

Review of Critters (1986)

By Imthenoob (1,101) on 18 Apr 2019

The movie is only an hour and a half and yet it takes more than 30 minutes for the Critters to actually appear…

Read Review

More Reviews

Popular Movies Right Now

A Simple Favor

2018

69%617 Reviews

Mission: Impossible - Dead Reckoning Part One

2023

79%186 Reviews

No Hard Feelings

2023

65%90 Reviews

The Equalizer

2014

69%994 Reviews

Alien: Covenant

2017

61%1,909 Reviews

Mad Max: Fury Road

2015

83%1,378 Reviews

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse

2023

85%233 Reviews

Hillbilly Elegy

2020

61%141 Reviews

The Prodigy

2019

53%39 Reviews

Top Gun: Maverick

2022

82%272 Reviews

Movies You Viewed Recently

Welcome to Mooseport

2004

38%251 Reviews

Pocahontas II: Journey to a New World

1998

44%349 Reviews

The Crow: Salvation

2000

57%335 Reviews

Zenon: The Zequel

2001

62%26 Reviews

RoboCop

2014

56%1,061 Reviews

Harold and Maude

1971

78%764 Reviews

Viridiana

1962

82%240 Reviews

Room

2015

84%1,167 Reviews

Golden Door

2006

70%228 Reviews

Mission Impossible

1971

59%724 Reviews