Review of Undead (2003) by Reverendd Dr. T Loco — 27 May 2008
Okay, I'm the part of society that loves the macabre. I've been a big zombie fan for years, and partly because there was a lack of it at one point in time. It almost felt like a rarity. Nowadays, everyone loves zombies, and everyone wants to cash in on them.
I now find myself avoiding zombie movies. Not only because they are everywhere, but because they pretty much all suck. And almost instantly the jock to the librarian are all "experts" on zombies.
What they are, how they die, what they do, what they don't do. Thanks Max Brooks. Your books suck, and you've turned a once rare and special thing into everyday nonsense. I really don't give a fuck if a zombie in some film is eating it's own arm and it would never do that because that doesn't happen, or animals can't be zombies because the virus only affects humans.
It's fucking fiction. Sorry for that rant, but I felt it necessary. This, however, is one zombie flick I still can watch. Zombie fish getting punched in the head, naked aliens feeling secure in their bodies, australian accents, and loads of gore? You know I'm in.
You don't even have to mention the dual and triple shotguns.
This review of Undead (2003) was written by Reverendd Dr. T Loco on 27 May 2008.
Undead has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
