Two for the Money (1972) - User Reviews - Page 4 of 21

61-80 of 405 Reviews

Sort by:

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Kristy P (519) on 25 Apr 2010

Blah. But then, I don't like football or gambling, so that could be why…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Tiffany C (324) on 25 Apr 2010

Blah. But then, I don't like football or gambling, so that could be why…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Phil M (269) on 31 Mar 2010

Matthew Mahogoney strikes again. To be fair the film isn't great and Pacino is not stretched at all…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Blæke W (312) on 23 Feb 2010

Anyone else in mcconaughey's role and the movie itself is instantly better...and gets a higher rating on this site…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Kj P (1,056) on 30 Dec 2009

Two for the Money is a 2005 film starring Al Pacino and Matthew McConaughey…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Andy P (1,510) on 29 Dec 2009

You get the sense it is trying too hard to be cool. A better team behind the camera would've helped…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Max S (301) on 27 Dec 2009

I thought this was a good, not great movie, with an accurate rep on sports gambling…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By L I N D (229) on 09 Dec 2009

I liked it, but there was something missing... a spark…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Ville H (331) on 08 Nov 2009

A slightly leaking script with okay characters. Al Pacino brings his usual, and Brandon Lang and John Anthony are played very well by M. MaCounaghey…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By David H (2,838) on 06 Oct 2009

Pacino produced a powerfully perfect performance and the story was perfectly persevering in poignency, plot potency and produced pondacity…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Ray J (665) on 06 Oct 2009

Pacino produced a powerfully perfect performance and the story was perfectly persevering in poignency, plot potency and produced pondacity…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Lucy N (74) on 22 Sep 2009

You know, the best part of the best drug in the world isn't the high. It's the moment just before you take it…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Jason C (2,488) on 09 Sep 2009

Pacino is awesome, Russo is decent, McConaughey is annoying as fuck…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Ryan B (2,114) on 08 Sep 2009

You know, I wasn't terribly pissed off after watching this movie, though I wasn't really that thrilled after seeing it, either…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Sean S (1,358) on 08 Sep 2009

Good film about greed and what money can do, sometimes the plot is tedious but the performances pull it through…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Warren C (123) on 24 Aug 2009

Nothing's new here, the plot is kinda predictable, but what a wonderful writing (so smart)…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Pauline L (196) on 21 Aug 2009

Pretty good film, very entertaining to watch. Good story, wickedly funny…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Jeff A (530) on 05 Aug 2009

This is a decent movie. Strong performances by Pacino, McConaughey and Russo…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Douglas E (210) on 02 Aug 2009

Wasted talents on a boring script filled with nothing but winning and losing money. Put this in the waste case with other Pacino films in the 2000's…

Read Review

Review of Two for the Money (1972)

By Joe T (673) on 26 Jul 2009

The 'twist', that Al Pacino isn't really evil he's just addicted to losing, makes it slightly better than just plain boring nonsense…

Read Review

Page 4 of 21

More reviews of this movie:

Perhaps you were looking for: