Review of Titanic II (2010) by Shanna G — 04 Apr 2012
Now before you say anything, let me just say, "YES! This is all TRUE!" After the James Cameron highest grossing film of all time which was later beaten by Avatar twelve years later, some sneaky bitch in the silent movie industry decided it was time to make a sequel/mockbuster/rip-off/whatever to my favourite movie of all time.
While the original RMS "Unsinkable" Titanic aka The-Ship-of-Dreams movie was more historical, this new version takes place in modern times where they built "ANOTHER" Titanic ship, (not kidding) "ANOTHER" Titanic ship and named it the Titanic II, (again not kidding) the Titanic fucking II! because apparently this movie takes place in 2012 which is 100 years after the original sinking of the ship so therefore to dedicate that sinking, they rebuilt the ship again or some shit like that and wouldn't you have guessed it-the new ship sinks as well this time not by an iceberg, by a fucking global warming (again not kidding x3) "GLOBAL WARMING!!!!!!!!!!" Because apparently this caused the Helheim glacier to melt creating a 800mph tidal wave sending an iceberg crashing into the Titanic II.
So yeah the second ship did sink because of an iceberg but the story is much much stupider than the original. Just how stupid can it get? Isn't the history of the Titanic so insulting to you now that you just wish that you were sinking with Jack and Rose right now along with the ship :( The only actor I really noticed was Bruce Davison who played Senator Kelly in X-Men and that was it.
Titanic II gets a 4/10.
This review of Titanic II (2010) was written by Shanna G on 04 Apr 2012.
Titanic II has generally received negative reviews.
Was this review helpful?
