Review of The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009) by Fredr — 08 Dec 2009
Being a middle-aged man who writes screenplays I like to stay abreast of what is successful. I was pleasantly surprised by the first twilight movie. It had tension as Bella puzzled about Edward, then after realizing what he is, the tension became over the consummation question.
Becoming a vampire is the metaphorical equivalent of sex and the tension and chemistry between the actors held my interest. Not the case with the new one. I found it interminably boring. I've seen Kristen Stewart in 4 films and the only one she has believable romantic chemistry is Twilight.
Perhaps she has authentic off-screen feelings for Pattinson so she showed that in the first film. But there's no chemistry between her and Lautner, her and Eisenberg in Adventureland or her and Sanford in some crappy indie.
She has much appeal in many ways and is not nearly as bad as Scarlett Johansen, but she has to grow. The film as a whole was overlong, boring and weak. It repeated the same plot devices as the first film, this time it's lautner with a secret.
And how many solemn promises can these guys break? If you aren't a die-hard twilight fan - skip it.
This review of The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009) was written by Fredr on 08 Dec 2009.
The Twilight Saga: New Moon has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
