Review of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) by Sean Nelson for The Stranger (Seattle, WA) — 21 Aug 2017
Ultimately, the chief difference between this film and its two predecessors is the presence of resolution. The story ends, just like we all knew it would. And there's something inherently disappointing about that.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) was written by Sean Nelson and published by The Stranger (Seattle, WA) on 21 Aug 2017.
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King has generally received very positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
