Review of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003) by Stephen Hunter for Washington Post — 28 Jul 2010
It's not brazenly bad or heroically bad or stridently bad. It's bad in all the old, dull ways of being bad: poor performances, absurd story, dreary special effects, witless dialogue and the excessive length of someone taking himself far too seriously.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003) was written by Stephen Hunter and published by Washington Post on 28 Jul 2010.
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
