Review of The Infiltrator (2016) by Spencer G — 11 Jul 2016
First of all this film is too long. it's just over 2 hours long and would run better if it had been properly edited. That is the largest flaw in the film. It isn't perfect by.
Any stretch at times I felt just cut to the chase. It felt like someone who.
Supplies more details than needed providing information you really have no.
Need for, thus, the writing has issues. However, now that the flaws are out if the.
Way. This is a better than average film with very good acting, interesting.
Characters, and a very absorbing storyline. As you would expect Bryan.
Cranston is wonderful in this role as a Federal agent , undercover and all the.
Acting around him is better than average. Even with the painful length and.
Terrible editing, this is still a worthwhile film. I recommend it for the acting and.
The dialogue. Considering the script was much too long, what is left are.
Character studies that you find yourself interested in, relationships that make.
Sense, Bad guys that have class, bad guys that launder money that have no.
Conscience with Bryan Cranston stuck in the middle of all of this. Cranston holds this film together and as I already stated with the help of a better than.
Average cast. It is by far the most interesting film I have seen this summer but.
It's only July and I am waiting for many more. If you have to pick one that is.
Playing this week including the high grossing films from the past few weeks I say this is the best bet.
This review of The Infiltrator (2016) was written by Spencer G on 11 Jul 2016.
The Infiltrator has generally received positive reviews.
Was this review helpful?
