Review of The Hills Have Eyes (2006) by Nathan Lee for The New York Times — 02 Apr 2006
Snobs may balk, purists will be appalled, but this new and exceedingly nasty version of Wes Craven's 1977 cult shocker is awfully good at what it does. And mostly what it does is make you feel awful.
You can read the full review where it was originally posted online.
This review of The Hills Have Eyes (2006) was written by Nathan Lee and published by The New York Times on 02 Apr 2006.
The Hills Have Eyes has generally received mixed reviews.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
