Cinafilm has over 5 million movie reviews and counting …
Sitemap
Search

Last updated: 11 Jul 2026 at 10:05 UTC

Back to movie details

Review of by Robert B — 04 Jan 2014

Share
Tweet

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Sergio Leone, 1967).

[originally posted 15Feb2001].

There are a number of great things about this movie. The first ten minutes. The last ten minutes. The theme music, which has come to be synonymous with the American west. Lee van Cleef, who was great in every role he ever played.

And then there was the middle hundred sixty minutes.

There's an odd tendency among filmmakers to take a razor-thin plot and stretch it far too long. Such is the case here, with the plot being a race between the Man with No Name (Clint Eastwood), a hired gun named Angel Eyes (van Cleef), and the Man with No Name's on-again off-again sidekick Tuco (Eli Wallach) to find a cache of stolen gold during the Civil War. This plot meanders for two and three-quarters hours before getting on track, and that's about an hour and three-quarters too long. The subplots are never developed, nor are the characters. Tuco switches allegiances every ten minutes. After a while, it gets just plain boring.

Definitely could have used a good editor. Eastwood's westerns got better with age (his, not theirs); Unforgiven and Pale Rider are better, tighter films. **.

This review of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly (1966) was written by on 04 Jan 2014.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly has generally received very positive reviews.

Was this review helpful?

Yes
No

More Reviews of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

More reviews of this movie

Share This Page

Share
Tweet

Popular Movies Right Now

Movies You Viewed Recently

Get social with CinafilmFollow us for reviews of the latest moviesCinafilm - TwitterCinafilm - PinterestCinafilm - RSS