Review of The Final Destination (2009) by Blæke W — 25 Sep 2011

The Final Destination (2009).

Directed by: David R. Ellis.

R, 1 hr. 22 min.

Release Date: August 28, 2009.

The race track one. alot more evenfull I thought but geez (again) the sceptic in the group is a black guy again what would be weirder lol.

I`m getting through them all this week and see not ..Fd 1- 2 pretty watchable and 3 isn`t bad, 4 is a little more gore funny but FD5 (and i`m talking 3D cinima experience) not only has the piro0-techniqs of the rest but gets a little more interpersonal on a character level as all have been a different set of chartacters with only a slight idio-syncratic relationship as a point of refference to any of the other pictures characters.

And so on from the first (advice - leave/exit the way you came in)...

Well i`ll start with actually renting this product to view, a couple of ..dare I say 'weird' things happened (but no-one died which is cool) I saw it approx. 2005 first time on DvD and missed the whole 'thing' and the hyp from release time entirely and when I heard this week of F.D.5 as m.o.v (movie of the week) at a discount $13 bucks I wasn`t sceptical at all. So I rented This again intendin to cram all four and if successful go and see the feature 5th installment, only it was 'the final Destination' /F.D. 4. So I had to return and swap after I had inserted into the machine (drat) but didn`t want to spoil the future hehe. When I returned it the only copy of F.D.4 was out untill only the next ,but still. I ring the next day about lunch time and they had a look to see if in and after a long wait with some um and arr-ing I finally said oh no it`s 'final destination 1' not 'final fantasy 1'. I felt kinda dumb (double drat) after a few hour I get the call it`s in and viewed remembering then when I had viewed it last and that I didn`t see 'IT' all the way, back in 2005.

I really got the gist of it (and christianity for that matter) this time but felt from it ...actually to distract one from death stalking and so I looked up 'Destiny' for a more concise definition, to stay 'on track'- you understand, and there were other interesting things like agenda, preparatory, fate, kismet (Arab/Turk) even weird and the like describing it. All, so fantasic distractions, or not and really I couldn`t think of a more descriptive thing/verb than the making of a motion picture 'production' ...duh!prompt.

Anyway equal and opposite reations, science, love, magnetics, yin and yang, things like that are all fuel to the fire aswell that is the apple to bight into, was a good moral lernt for me.

Basically really liked it (sceptic flush, funny, tense, suspense, some action and a little gore) but as relevant to my interests in 'time traveling the motion picture' as is 'GroundHog Day' or 'Prince of Persia' for that matter.

Going to put the same review down for F.D. 2 as I happed to get through it aswell the next day and for a sequal, was a better movie (remake-maybe but a sequal, rare) I thought, funnier as well, it just lacked the originality of the first film (but I won`t go into how unoriginal that is, or anything for that matter, but lets not get poetic :o).

Final Destination 2 (2003) Directed by: David R. Ellis R, 1 hr. 30 min. Release Date: January 31, 2003 Well i`ll start with actually renting this product to view, a couple of ..dare I say 'weird' things happened (but no-one died which is cool) I saw it approx. 2005 first time on DvD and missed the whole 'thing' and the hyp from release time entirely and when I heard this week of F.D.5 as m.o.v (movie of the week) at a discount $13 bucks I wasn`t sceptical at all. So I rented This again intendin to cram all four and if successful go and see the feature 5th installment, only it was 'the final Destination' /F.D. 4. So I had to return and swap after I had inserted into the machine (drat) but didn`t want to spoil the future hehe. When I returned it the only copy of F.D.4 was out untill only the next ,but still. I ring the next day about lunch time and they had a look to see if in and after a long wait with some um and arr-ing I finally said oh no it`s 'final destination 1' not 'final fantasy 1'. I felt kinda dumb (double drat) after a few hour I get the call it`s in and viewed remembering then when I had viewed it last and that I didn`t see 'IT' all the way, back in 2005. I really got the gist of it (and christianity for that matter) this time but felt from it ...actually to distract one from death stalking and so I looked up 'Destiny' for a more concise definition, to stay 'on track'- you understand, and there were other interesting things like agenda, preparatory, fate, kismet (Arab/Turk) even weird and the like describing it. All, so fantasic distractions, or not and really I couldn`t think of a more descriptive thing/verb than the making of a motion picture 'production' ...duh!prompt. Anyway equal and opposite reations, science, love, magnetics, yin and yang, things like that are all fuel to the fire aswell that is the apple to bight into, was a good moral lernt for me Basically really liked it (sceptic flush, funny, tense, suspense, some action and a little gore) but as relevant to my interests in 'time traveling the motion picture' as is 'GroundHog Day' or 'Prince of Persia' for that matter. Going to put the same review down for F.D. 2 as I happed to get through it aswell the next day and for a sequal, was a better movie (remake-maybe but a sequal, rare) I thought, funnier as well, it just lacked the originality of the first film (but I won`t go into how unoriginal that is, or anything for that matter, but lets not get poetic :o).

Clear rating.